AAP needs to clear policy
confusion
Running a government is a sober and serious business
Running a government is a sober and serious business
Rajindar Sachar
It is hoped that the Delhi Law
Minister has understood Article 227 of the Constitution of India providing for
the separation of powers between the executive and the judiciary. He along with
Chief Minister Kejriwal had an audience with the Chief Justice of the Delhi
High Court the other day so as to remove any impression of even indirect
interference in the domain of the judiciary. It does not behove an AAM minister
to reach late by one hour and disrupt the screening of a film at a public
centre to deliver a lecture. Is this not more act of a feudal lord than that of
an elected minister? The AAP government also needs to clarify its announced
policy of 95 per cent of the Delhiites only being eligible for the Delhi
colleges — a policy opposed by DUTA and student associations.
It is self-evident that any
political party must present a defined socially relevant policy. That the
country should have a corruption-free government is unexceptional and no party
can possibly say to the contrary. People naturally will judge it by actual
experience. But then people want to know whether the objectives laid down by
our founders of the Constitution are the ones on which any government, state or
Central is functioning. Some of the basic unalterable objectives of our
Constitution postulate the government's active role in developing an inclusive
society with special consideration for the minorities like the Muslims and the
Christians and to minimise inequalities in society. In short, any political
party must spell out clearly its position vis-à-vis the big corporate sector,
foreign as well as Indian, and its commitment to socialism and the public
sector, emphasised by Dr. Ambedkar as being the objective of the Constitution.
Unfortunately, on all these policy matters there is a resounding silence by
AAP.
It is not enough to say that a party
is committed to the poor - that bald declaration is made by even neo-fascist
groups all over the world, including India. A party has to spell out the
instruments it will apply to achieve the growth of the economy. In India public
sector undertakings like Oil India and NTPC are a strong bulwark of growth as
against the failure of some of the biggest private sector corporations, the
hands of some of them being sullied by the Coalgate and telecom scandals. With
that experience for a party to cast a doubt on the public sector existence is
to betray the constitutional mandate. Also a party going national must also
indicate its position on the ongoing policy of the Central government in
selling off the family silver (PSUs) to private predators. The AAP policy
against FDI in retail is, of course, on the right direction.
The right to food is an absolute
right of every citizen in the country. The PUCL has been fighting for the
acceptance of the right in the Supreme Court for years - it is because of this
that the governments have been obligated to pass the Right to Food Act for
supplying the food at subsidised prices. But if a party has doubts about the
subsidy, then it must enlighten the public how the poor are to get even the
minimum food required for keeping alive.
The AAP government is obligated to
clear its policy on the demand of the Socialist Party and the Pension Parishad
to raise the pension for Delhi's elderly people who get a monthly minimum
pension of Rs. 5,000.
An immediate response from the AAP
government is called for to the danger of displacement of lakhs of people,
pointed out by Medha Patkar, the NAPAM leader, due to the decision on the
Delhi-Mumbai and Amritsar-Kolkata corridors being activated soon.
The self-praise by AAP that it has
solved the water problem in Delhi is cynical. The supply of 700 liters free
water a day means nothing to about 40 per cent of the people simply because
there are no water pipes in their areas and the government is not supplying
water at all. They depend on water mafia tankers available at exorbitant rates.
Areas like Zakir Nagar and Sangam Vihar have the D.J.B. water pipes passing
them by at a little distance but the D.J.B. refuses to connect these areas,
thus leaving them at the mercy of the mafia. In fact, the experiment of
privatisation of water must be discontinued. This facility must remain in the public
sector as the right to water is a human right.
No doubt, corruption is an evil
eating into the vitals of our society. But you do not fight it by spreading
suspicion about every one's honesty excepting those belonging to the ruling
party. To what dangerous proportion this is sought to be practised is clear
when AAP unabashedly announces that its government is creating a service which
will teach public callers how to conduct a sting operation. The government
feels this will create a fear psychosis in each civil servant. This is
frightening. This method reminds me of the system devised during the decadent
period of the USSR regime when Russian children were indoctrinated to spy on
their parents and report to the secret service and then were publicly honoured.
Corruption is not eased out by such hare-brained sting operations but rather by
the top of the administration being above reproach.
It is a pity that Chief Minister
Kejriwal has announced with a boastful flourish that the defaulters of the
electricity bills from March 2013 onwards belonging to his party will not be
required to pay the arrears and instead these will be paid by the Delhi
government. The justification given is that it has to be assumed that all these
defaulters were part of the "andolan" launched in March by AAP. This
is a dangerous view apart from being legally impermissible. The state
government cannot distinguish between people who vote for or against it. As it
is, a question may well be asked at this partiality by lakhs of voters who had
paid their electricity bills and also voted for AAP: Are some people more equal
than others? It needs to be continuously remembered that running a government
is a sober business and not a public bluster or empty rhetoric.
Delhi
January 18, 2014
January 18, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment