Resolution
(Deliberated upon and passed in the one-day seminar on ‘Justice Sachar Committee Report : A
Review After 10 Years’)
The
Sachar Committee, headed by Justice Rajindar Sachar, was constituted in 2005 by
the then Prime Minister of India Dr. Manmohan Singh to prepare a report about
social, economic and educational status of the Muslim community in the country.
The findings and recommendations of the report immediately became a topic of
sharp debate in political, social and intellectual circles as it was presented
in the Lok Sabha on 30 November 2006. The report has completed 10 years of its
release on 30 November 2016. To mark this occasion Socialist Yuvjan Sabha
(SYS), People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) and Khudai Khidmatgar have organized
a one-day seminar in Gandhi Peace Foundation, Delhi, on 22 December 2016. Scholars from various disciplines including some
representatives of the Muslim community participated in the deliberations and
reviewed the progress of the report, particularly the implementation aspect of
its recommendations, carried out by central and state governments in the last
10 years.
Following
resolution was deliberated upon and passed at the end of the seminar.
The Minorities, especially the
Muslims, have been the ignored factor by all Central Governments. Amongst the
various recommendations, the Prime Minister’s High Level Committee Report had
recommended the establishment of Equal Opportunity Commission (EOC) as an
instrument to prevent discrimination against minorities in the private sector
like housing, employment (since courts cannot interfere in cases of discrimination
in private sector). This recommendation has been inexcusably violated and also
remained in cold storage.
The EOC can be set up by the state
governments without taking permission from the Central government. Hence this
seminar resolves that the present state governments run by secular parties
should immediately establish the EOC in their respective states.
A very urgent recommendation of the Prime Minister’s High Level
Committee Report dealt with the unfairness of divisions of electoral
constituencies which results in lesser number of Muslims in the legislature to
which they are broadly entitled based on the population. This anomaly arises
from the irrational demarcation of seats in the legislature.
Thus in U.P. there is abundant
potential for substantial number of Muslims to win seats. For instance, in U.
P. that sends the largest number of members (80) to Lok Sabha, there are 25-
52%, Muslim’s in 18 seats, in 23 seats Muslims are 15- 24% and in another 18
seats Muslims are 10-14%. Similar is the demographic – electoral reflection in
most of the states.” It was further pointed out that delimitation of
constituencies in a fair manner is essential. But on the contrary the
constituencies with substantial number of Muslims have been reserved for S.C.,
and constituencies with substantial number of S.C. voters are unreserved. This
is unfair to both Muslims and S.C. electorate.
The Committee had hoped that it
would receive the attention of the Government immediately because the
Delimitation Commission was at that time engaged in this exercise and evidently
any suggestion or any exercise to be done by it had to be undertaken
during the current term of the then Delimitation Commission.
The Committee had concluded that
Muslims were thus denied benefits in politics since assembly constituencies
where the voter population from the community was substantial were reserved for
scheduled caste candidates for election. In all fairness it would have been
more equitable to reserve those constituencies for SCs where their voter
population is high rather than those where it is low and the Muslims presence
is higher.
But, the High Powered Committee’s
suggestion was ignored during the delimitation. This anomaly is a reason for
low representation of Muslims in the legislatures. How inequitable that
important issues related to the community are ignored or don’t get the desired
priority. Somebody has to take the responsibility for not taking concrete
action in order to remove this anomaly. Mere lip sympathy is a façade. The
seminar resolves that a concrete action should be taken in this matter.
Niraj Singh
(President SYS, Mob. : 9716602280, 9911970162)
Ravikiran Jain
(President, PUCL
Faisal Khan
(President, Khudai
Khidmatgar)
No comments:
Post a Comment