Rajindar Sachar
Though
introduced by former Prime Minister Mr. Deve Gowda for the first time on 12
September 1996 in the Lok Sabha, no concrete action was taken by various
governments to effectuate the legislation on Women’s Reservation Bill in
Parliament and the state legislatures. Everyone expected the legislation to be passed
immediately. In fact, Prime Minister I.K. Gujral promised his earliest priority
in passing this Bill but nothing concrete happened.
When
the UPA government came to power in 2004, it announced that the Act would be
its first priority. But instead one had total silence on the Bill in the
President’s speech on the opening day of the Parliamentary session. This was an
open and clear notice to the women activists that the Bill, which had been
so proudly projected as a commitment to gender equality, has been quietly
buried, and is not likely to be revived in conceivable future.
Thereafter
the Women Reservation Bill was referred to Parliamentary Standing Committee but
nothing happened till 2010, when women reservation bill or the constitution
(108 th Amendment Bill 2008) which was proposed to amend the Constitution of
India to reserve 33% of all seats in the Lower House of Parliament of India,
the Lok Sabha, and in all State Legislative Assemblies for women.
The
Rajya Sabha passed the Bill on 9 March 2010. It was this event that made Sushma
Swaraj and Sonia Gandhi embrace each other so emotionally. However, the Lok
Sabha never voted on the Bill. The Bill lapsed after the dissolution of the
15th Lok Sabha in 2014.
Every
time from 1998 to 2014, whenever Parliament met, women representatives were
assured in all solemnity by each major political party that it hoped to pass
the Bill in that very session. In reality, this was a tongue-in- cheek
operation, because no further progress was made in the matter of women
reservation.
The
reality is that male chauvinism will never reserve seats for women because it
will take away 1/3 of the present strength of parliament for women. I therefore
feel that way out can only be by increasing the strength of Lok Sabha to 750
and making 1/3 of seats to double member constituencies with one seat therein to
be reserved for women. Of course the women will be eligible to contest from
other than reserved seats and may therefore increase their number beyond 1/3 of
the total parliament seats.
Thus,
Lok Sabha membership can be easily increased to 750, with a provision that one
woman candidate will mandatorily be elected from those double-member
constituencies, and, depending upon the votes received, it may be that even
both elected candidate could be women. This law was laid down by the Supreme
Court decades ago in former President V.V. Giri’s case. The same principle will
apply in the case of elections to the state legislatures.
Space
in Parliament is not a problem. Shivraj Patil, once Union Home Minister, is on
record in admitting that space is not a problem if Parliament decides to
increase the number of seats.
The
alternative of double member constituencies can be done by amending Article
81(2) of the Constitution by increasing the present strength, which can be
easily done if political parties are genuine in their commitment to the Bill.
I
know the Delimitation Commission has already marked the constituencies on the
basis of single member seats. But I do not think it is necessary to redraw the
constituencies to make it double.
By
a rule of thumb the top one third of the constituencies having the maximum
voters in each state could be declared double-member. If the legislators are
sincerely genuine they could even submit an agreed list.
At present, of course, a fresh process has again to be initiated in Parliament, because the previous Reservation Bill lapsed with the dissolution of the previous Lok Sabha in 2014.
At present, of course, a fresh process has again to be initiated in Parliament, because the previous Reservation Bill lapsed with the dissolution of the previous Lok Sabha in 2014.
In
the just finished election propaganda in Uttar Pradesh, not one party,
including the so-called seculars, with the exception of the Socialist Party
(India), included the item of reservation for women in their election
manifestoes. Can such male chauvinism be allowed to exist in our country?
With
the 2019 Parliamentary elections coming, is it not time for the women
leadership in both the Congress and BJP, through Sonia Gandhi and Sushma Swaraj
to jointly clench their fists and warn all the parties that they will no longer
tolerate this injustice and neglect to continue? They may legitimately continue
their differences on other subjects in the light of their own respective
programmes.
Now
that Sonia Gandhi has promised full support to the Bill, Modi who claims to
stand for Swatch Bharat (which is a programme to enhance the dignity of the
women in the country) cannot have any objection. His request to Mamata Banerjee
and Mayawati should invoke immediate positive response from those leaders.
Any
suggestion by opponents of the bill by creating hurdle by suggesting that women
quota be further sub divided by reserving proportionate number of seats for OBC
and SC women. Dalits separately is cheap trick to deny women a real share in
power.
Let
me point out that biggest supporter of Dalits and backward castes Dr. Lohia had
opined that reservation for women was an instrument of social engineering – he
could never have suggested splitting the strength of women’s quota by further
splitting them in sub quotas.
At
present there are only 61 Women Members in Lok Sabha. The shame of
discrimination against women and the masochist attitude of men can only be
corrected by providing reservation for women’s share in the legislatures – both
in Parliament and State Assemblies.
Rajindar Sachar
No comments:
Post a Comment