Prem Singh
The author teaches at Delhi University and is president of Socialist Party |
The
eyewitnesses, historians, and administrative officials have analyzed the
"duty" played by General Dyer from various perspectives and angles - starting
from Dyer's racial hatred towards
Indians to his psychiatric disorder. The British government constituted Hunter
Commission for investigation and the Congress also set up its probe committee. The
Army Commission was also set up in England to investigate the role of General
Dyer. Dyer's action of direct firing was discussed in England's lower and upper
houses also. Although the majority in the Lower House rejected Dyer's action but
the majority in the Upper House was in favor of Dyer. The Morning Post,
a newspaper in England, collected around 30,000 Pounds for Dyer in recognition
of his services to the Empire. The British in England and British officials in
India mostly acclaimed Dyer as the protector of the 'Raj'.
Jawaharlal
Nehru has written in his autobiography that while returning from Lahore to Delhi
by train, he himself heard General Dyer telling his military companions that he
did precisely what he ought to do on April 13, 1919. General Dyer was returning
in the same compartment after giving testimony before the Hunter Commission. General
Dyer, in his every testimony and conversation, had justified his action without
any sign of regret or remorse. There are indications that he even said that if he
had more ammunition and soldiers, he would have taken more strict action. It
seems that if Dyer had been able to carry the two armored cars with built-in guns,
which could not be taken inside the Jallianwala Bagh due to the narrow road,
the scale of the massacre would have been enormous!
Based
on Hunter Commission's report and other evidences, General Dyer was removed
from his military post and barred from further employment in India. Dyer, who was
born in India, returned to England and died on 24 July 1927 from illness. Revolutionary
Udham Singh shot and killed Michael O'Dwyer on March 13, 1940 at Caxton Hall in
London, as he had pledged just after the massacre. Udham Singh did not run away
from the spot. He was arrested and hanged on July 31, 1940. Udham Singh was
raised in an orphanage. He was admirer of Bhagat Singh and advocate of
Hindu-Muslim unity. It is said that while living in the orphanage, he had named
himself Ram Mohammed Singh Azad.
After
the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, Rabindranath Tagore and Gandhi returned their
titles of 'Knighthood' and 'Kesar-e-Hind'. After this incident, the Indian Independence
Movement entered the new phase. After three decades of strong struggle and
sacrifices, the country got Independence. However, the ruling class of India has
not been able to keep that Independence safe. Instead, it has pushed the country
into the slavery of neo-imperialism. Now only 'communalism, casteism, dynastic
rule, individualism and Englishism are the basic contents which have
been left in the name of 'free India'. Under the leadership of this very ruling
class, the people of India are sneering to each other to grab maximum share in neo-imperialist
loot of the country. It is being proudly told by the ruling class that this is
the 'New India', which should be admired by everyone and flourished at all costs!
In
such a situation there is no need for centennial celebrations of sacrifice made
at the Jallianwala Bagh. The need of the hour is to restore the anti-imperialist
spirit and to keep it ignited. So that the sacrifices of the martyrs should not
be in vain. In this direction the Socialist Party will organize some programs throughout
the year beginning from today. The participation and support of all fellow
citizens would be expected.
Salute
to the martyrs of Jallianwala Bagh!
No comments:
Post a Comment